Top Most SEO Predictions for 2014

2013 was been something of a "positioning" year. We know where we're going (queries not keywords, adwords make more influence, structured data & HTML5, user friendly content) – yet we're not there yet. We know SEOs should be advertisers, however extremely a lot of people are most certainly not. Furthermore never will be.

2014 will be a combination year, as I would like to think. We'll get closer to the greater part of the above – we'll see the effect of on-page keyword focusing on lessen, and Google will better understand quality.

We'll see our natural postings psychologist significantly further, and we'll see structured data to show the better signs of improvement. We may even get compensated for our "extraordinary" content, without needing to depend on SEO strategies.

My look ahead to 2014 joins together my two psyches – the pessimist and idealist person. In place for the idealist person to get a say, we should permit the pessimist its voice first, shall we?

1. Penguin 3.0 rolls out in April or May

As expectations go, this is one of the less demanding ones. It's similar to saying "there'll be a FA Cup Final in May". You know its going to happen – you're simply not 100% beyond any doubt who's included.

My estimation is that Google is now near to completely finished with Penguin – it may even be that they're just 20% in the future. You can explain that one of two ways:

1. There's a great deal of spam around
2. Google aren't quite great at distinguishing spam

Their recently launch of Anglo Rank, a black hat link network, was unrefined PR under the most favorable conditions. Assuming that Google were any great at "busting" link networks, they'd visit Black Hat World and sign up for everything being promoted. I could do that. Thusly, I incline towards the second explanation, while tolerating the first.

There is a ton of spam, and we should not imagine that its all casino or payday advance members purchasing links. The top travel and protection firms, tricked by the many month to month natural hits, are deep rooted spammers themselves. They've spammed more than a gambling joint or payday credit subsidiary could long for, and the vast majority of them have not been penalize. They've utilized article marketing and link networks, they've slipped keywords rich content and anchor-text-rich links everywhere throughout the web – but they get by on the quality of their brands.

Penguin 3.0 will simply be an alternate emphasis, and it will hit individuals hard. It may even hit individuals who thought they had recovered. I have one customer who we helped recover from an algorithmic penalty, just for Google to turn around and say "ahh yes, however you didn't discard these three links, did you" and apply a manual punishment for links we couldn't have discard. What's more yes, they had been denied.

You think you've recovered? Watch your back.

2.Press releases and guest blogs will be targeted

The issue with SEOs is that assuming that you provide for them (us) an inch, they (we) will take a mile. We were talented visitor blogging – an eminent method for building power, making companions, going for new composition styles, picking up new groups of viewers – and we transformed it into a link cultivate the extent of India.

It's moderately simple to recognize great visitor blogging from terrible visitor blogging. There will be blow-back, however – anybody got up to speed in that indistinct zone of doubtful visitor blogging (you know, those sites that let you post robotically) could discover their exactly ethical articles got in the cross-fire.

Nonetheless, in the event that you've been writing regular columns for contextually relevant, industry-heading sites, you'll be fine. Won't you.

In the event that you've been pumping out press release, however, its high time you were hung by your algorithms. The best PR experts have since a long time ago quit pumping out press release with the expectation that it'll get them more presentation – and the best SEO experts have never even touched press release.

Occasionally, I meet a SEO who accepts that press release submissions work, and I yield that yes, they do. They work on the grounds that Google – again – isn't quite great at its occupation. 2014, definitely, will be the year that the strategy of pumping out press release passes on its passing.

The following may additionally be focused on:

• Individuals who are attempting to diversion Authorship with fake personas 
• Fake social personas & like-purchasing 
• Responsive sites that load adverts which "move" the content around the screen while loading 
• Extreme inbound linking with exact anchor text (if it hasn’t already been targeted) 

3. An e-commerce update will hit people hard

Ecommerce has as of recently been hit hard – that upgrade was called Panda, and hammered sites who had been duplicate manufacturer product descriptions. In this manner, Google has chosen to consume more of the first page for its promoting – so ecommerce destinations have needed to

a. pay, and 

b. be more innovative 

At last, however, Google seems, by all accounts, to be chipping away at a Merchant Quality upgrade, and that must be stressing to any traders who are, erm, not quite great.

Matt Cutts spoke about it a while back, and even made a guarantee to it. Consequent articles in the SEO blogosphere have frightened visiters with talk of "Google Zebra", however the reality of the situation is that ecommerce possessors will progressively need to take a look at the two alternatives above.

A redesign will most likely center in on surveys, additionally different signs of a low quality trader, whatever they could be. Rumours that they may utilize information from Google trader focus are most likely off the imprint.

Panda may be a definitive determiner thus, matching up inquiries to drop-off rates and penalising websites that visitors don't engage with. It appears to me the fairest method for managing 'low quality' ecommerce sites.

4. Google’s coming after your industry

Moneysupermarket complained earlier this year that their income was down because of a drop in keyword positions. Also this was most likely halfway correct.

On the other hand, they neglected to say that they had another competitor. One that was able to achieve number 1 positions for every keyword it needed. A competitor so great at SEO, you'd need to ask if they were unethical.

Yes, it was Google. Once more.

In the event that Google can catch Car Insurance activity for itself, then you can bet your every last penny that they'll catch any possible type of protection, as well.

Hotels, check. Flights, check. Car hire – clearly. What's next – Payday advances? Actually, it might be restricted to clean up the SERPs.

Google will never rest, and it will never continue through to the end – keeping in mind it is making learning charts and examination widgets, it is truth be told turning into an one-stop shop. You need to know the climate in Blackpool? Google will let you know its raining. Consistently. You need to change over £10 into euros? Google can do that for you.

Whatever you do, you need to keep two steps in front of Google. Certainly, they can give helpful correlation widgets, however would they be able to send you a cuddly meerkat? They can change over monetary standards, however would they be able to provide for you consultation on the best places to trade coin in Paris? (tip – I used to live close Pigalle, the bureaux de change may look dodgy however the conversion standard is dependably better and commission free). 

Google's nearing after you, whatever you do. Begin running.

That is it for the Google-fear. We truly shouldn't be approaching 2014 in a state of alarm, however. Updates will happen – they generally do. Let’s be all is well.

5.Structured data grows along with Hummingbird

I love Google's structured data highlighter – and schema.org is an extraordinary method for getting tiny details easily into result pages that have a pleasant incremental effect.

At the same time its still technical. Regularly excessively technical for some individuals. The breaking point frequently comes when its made handy.

Also, as Yahoo have indicated, structured data can give numerous other more interactive profits. For example, you could utilize structured data to force through a booking structure to the list items. Assuming that somebody actually needs to book an appointment at the dentist, why make them go through the hoops? 

2014 could be the year when structured data truly begins to have any kind of effect to the results pages – and that could be as an enhanced Knowledge Sidebar, or something totally new that surprises every one of us.
Also Hummingbird pops its loud head up here. Understanding information – and questions – is the huge test Google has set itself. There is a huge movement far from keywords towards points, headed principally by the ascent in voice seek which is more irregular than the catchphrase based wrote queries. Assuming that Google is to present the best search results for voice search (i.e. mobile), then it need to "get" complex queries and give the best results.

Information and Intent will be two huge considerations in 2014.

6. The rise of other Search Engines

The news that Yahoo is going to prohibit links from its algorithm surprised a ton of people. It delighted a lot of people, encouraging some to ask to why Google doesn't simply remove interfaces through and through. This is most likely not going to happen, in light of the fact that:

Yahaoo has to a greater degree a machine-based algorithm, and understands visitor experience better than Google can 

 
Yahoo are prohibiting links on the grounds that Indian spam is more awful than all others.
Yahoo have a bit more spryness in the commercial center, and this additionally makes extraordinary PR for them. 

They are increasing into various nations – with "additional to come" – it may not be much sooner than we see them encroaching further westwards, and we might welcome them with open arms.

7. Apple will try again

Why on earth did Apple purchase Topsy? That being said, no one knows. Also Apple are continuously all humble about it, saying "great, we do this sort of thing once in a while". 

It's an inconceivably overcome key move from Apple. Topsy doesn't fit into anything they as of recently manage without some kind of lateral thinking – it may fit into Siri, it may fit into Apple Maps, yet recall – Topsy is a search engine. It searches tweets and gives social analytics. As a search engine, it can provide for you the most topical search engine results you could request.

Does this imply that Apple are making a move into query? Real-time, social search? For an hardware & software organization, that is very much a gap to bridge, however its not a completely impractical one. To mix Topsy into social applications on Apple gadgets wouldn't be fiercely improbable, and this may be Apple's first fitting attack into search and social. It might, as some have prescribed, end up as part of the fabled Apple TV project. The 'second screen' is much looked for after.

Obviously, it may not work out. Nobody beyond any doubt. At the same time given the quality of search result (promoting, that is), and the expanding development of Apple's business,it’s a good way to go.

8. Authorship, at last

I've been truly vocal about authorship for some time now, and I haven't seen much affect other than photographs in the results pages. Some of the time. In the event that it lives up to expectations. Wow, and more articles from a writer.

What we do know is that Google can track who you write for, what you topic on, how much famous your written work is, and how great your writing is.

It would just be logical, consequently, to compensate those writers who meet some or those criteria. It would just be legitimate, obviously, to downgrade those writers who meet none of those criteria.

Once more, this is technical – rather excessively technical at the minute. You can test the rich snippet tools to the extent that you as, it doesn't generally work. Also there's a convoluted process behind it that we, as SEOs, may understand – however does each advertiser or each writer? It's doubtful. The extent of writers who have guaranteed their origin is going to be low.

That is either a chance or an issue.

Google will need to discover a method for crediting authorship without requesting that us go through technical hoops. I have probably it will, and I have undoubtedly creation will have a terrifying effect on search engine results.